mmmm.....yes. mark in jeans. i've pictured it a time or two myself. ~_^
but that's the thing with fetishes, isn't it? it's the contrasts...the heat and the cold, the pleasure and the pain....silk vs leather vs denim vs naked flesh. yeah. so the hair and the skin and perfectly loose and rumpled and faded denim, and there's the startling vulnerabilty to be found in bare feet. this entire visual is a treat to the eyes and to the touch. so i understand it, i think. he looks young and innocent and careless and unsophisticated, uncomplicated even, and yeah, vulnerable, and these things are not things we associate with mark, so the contrast is startling indeed. and yes, it's been filed away in the image cache. thank you. ^_^
no subject
Date: 2003-02-19 03:24 pm (UTC)but that's the thing with fetishes, isn't it? it's the contrasts...the heat and the cold, the pleasure and the pain....silk vs leather vs denim vs naked flesh. yeah. so the hair and the skin and perfectly loose and rumpled and faded denim, and there's the startling vulnerabilty to be found in bare feet. this entire visual is a treat to the eyes and to the touch. so i understand it, i think. he looks young and innocent and careless and unsophisticated, uncomplicated even, and yeah, vulnerable, and these things are not things we associate with mark, so the contrast is startling indeed. and yes, it's been filed away in the image cache. thank you. ^_^