ext_11768 ([identity profile] jamjar.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] jamjar 2008-11-05 12:12 am (UTC)

I don't know that I'd call Mercedes Lackey a thinky author. Her books aren't-- hm. They aren't convention-breaking and they don't feel like... oh, this is hard to put into words.

With some authors, their work shows a depth of creation. The world is clearly realised, the structure of it internally coherent and consistent, it's new and says things about humanity/sentience/whatever. Things are different and there's a reason for those differences, outcomes that all fit in with the logic and rules of that world.

Some authors, they show a depth of research. It feels Norse or Roman or 1960s Minneapolis, not just in decorations but in tiny details and big mindsets. Or it's a completely new world, fantasy or sci-fi, but it's perfectly realised.

I like Tamora Pierce-- one of the first books I ever ordered (back when amazon was still only a dream and you went into a bookshop and filled out a form and gave a £0.20 deposit) was the last one in the Lionness series and Amazon. The thing is, I like her, but I feel like Diana Wynne Jones (another children's/YA book writer that I still love) comes across as more thinky.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting